<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Would Someone Sign A No Brokerage Relationship?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tampa Florida Real Estate Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillsborough Property Taxes&#8211;Paid In The Rears?</title>
		<link>http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/#comment-13757</link>
		<dc:creator>Tampa Florida Real Estate Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillsborough Property Taxes&#8211;Paid In The Rears?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/#comment-13757</guid>
		<description>[...] Florida does allow this type of representation. Many states allow â€œdual-agencyâ€, in which a single agent can represent both parties in a real estate transaction. However Florida allows a â€œtransaction brokerageâ€ in which a single agent or single brokerage firm can work with both seller and buyer to facilitate the transaction. But neither party gets full representation. Can you see the conflict here? Many do not. The agent has to stay in the middle and provide a limited form of representation. Both parties must give up their right to single agency representation. Related Info [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Florida does allow this type of representation. Many states allow â€œdual-agencyâ€, in which a single agent can represent both parties in a real estate transaction. However Florida allows a â€œtransaction brokerageâ€ in which a single agent or single brokerage firm can work with both seller and buyer to facilitate the transaction. But neither party gets full representation. Can you see the conflict here? Many do not. The agent has to stay in the middle and provide a limited form of representation. Both parties must give up their right to single agency representation. Related Info [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Greene</title>
		<link>http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tampafloridarealestatefinder.com/255/why-would-someone-sign-a-no-brokerage-relationship/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that single agent representation for buyers is usually free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that single agent representation for buyers is usually free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
